Well, since that's rather boring, let's do another English event.
Feminine Irony is the title of this paper, and it exemplifies my ability to make all essays about feminism, religion, or both.
During the Elizabethan era, England had a female queen. However, this is ironic because, incongruously, women had no other power, and the queen kept her power frequently by repressing her own femininity. Isn't that fun?
For one thing, if Elizabeth got married, she couldn't be queen, which pretty much sucks. Also, I used the line about denying her femininity here, not in the first paragraph. Oops.
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet demonstrates that those gosh-darned Elizabethan females were weak, powerless, and repressed. Juliet doesn't get to choose her own husband. Then she offs herself. That is not fun. It is not fun at all. It is, really quite tragic. When I saw the show with Nyx, I cried for a good half hour afterwards, and then we went home and talked about how sexy the guy playing Romeo looked shirtless. He really did look good. Probably about as good as Norman, this guy from California who's going to RSI next year who's using a picture of his entire swim team in swimsuits as his profile picture, and they all look rather, uh, nice. What was I talking about again? Oh, yeah, Lord Capulet is a dickwad, right.
Oh, also, I need historical research in this paper. So, check it out, women were property of their husbands, and I'm going to back it up with laws and literature. Is that some great consonance or what? Anyways, I'm not going to bother with that sort of thing. I'm well above it.
Queen Elizabeth's situation was unique. Life sucked for everyone else.
2 comments:
I can back the property statement with some of those historical documents and/or Zinn quotes I used for my suffrage paper. In fact, it's in my intro somewhere.
I love those shirts. They look really cute.
dude. i love your reworked english papers. they're so funny and so much more entertaining than the original assignments.
Post a Comment